johnmorris

Robert Capa Focus Hocus-Pocus – The Darkroom Mishap

The “darkroom mishap” story occupies a large volume of Clan Coleman’s vituperative criticism of Capa and Morris.  The basic story goes like this, with slight variations over the years.

John Morris, Life magazine’s European picture editor in London, and his colleagues waited anxiously for Capa’s film to arrive after D-Day.  Other Life photographers would be sending back film, but Capa’s figure prominently in these tellings.

The film finally arrived at the Life offices at 2100 – 9pm the day after D-Day – and Morris immediately ordered his darkroom staff to process the film as quickly as possible.  Morris had an absolute deadline by which he had to send the film to New York for publication. 

In addition to other film that Capa exposed before and after the invasion while on the Chase – pictures of men on the ship and possible pictures of the armada –  Morris would have received the roll of 35mm film from Contax A and the "ruined" roll from Contax B.  Capa included a note that read, "Film like everything got wett by landing." [sic]  He had protected Contax A, so the only film that could have gotten wet was the roll from Contax B that he removed on the beach when he changed his film, that got wet in is pocket or camera bag when he waded out to the LCI. Capa may have included two more unexposed but soaked rolls.

While Morris waited, a senior darkroom technician, Hans Wild, called Morris from the darkroom to tell him the pictures were “fabulous.”  Subsequently, an adolescent darkroom assistant, Dennis Banks, ran into Morris’ office, informing him that almost all of the negatives had been ruined.  The “darkroom lad” explained that, to hasten the drying of the negatives under this deadline pressure, he had placed them in a cabinet and turned up a heating coil.  He apparently concluded that this overheated the negatives causing the emulsion to melt and ruin the film, ruining all but 10 images.  Morris, who rushed to inspect the film, said the negatives looked like "grey mud."(27) 

AI-generated image of Dennis Banks trying to understand how Robert Capa’s film was ruined right after Hans Wild said it was fabulous. That sick moment when he realized he had messed up, big time!

AI-generated image of John Morris examining the only useable images on one roll of Robert Capa’s film from Omaha Beach. Anxious Life magazine employees surround him.

Coleman et al., dispute the claim that heat could damage the film, which is the basis for their conclusion that Capa and/or Morris fabricated the story to cover for Capa’s lack of production that morning.  Tristan Da Cunha effectively has refuted the story.  Da Cunha subjected exposed period black and white film in a vintage Contax II camera, as well as exposed modern film, to high temperatures while drying.  The emulsion remained stable and did not melt or run in any of their experiments.(28)  .

The darkroom mishap story raises many questions, the first being, how did they go from fabulous to ruined in minutes?  As Coleman said, "I find it implausible that Morris would receive those precious, anxiously awaited, historic, irreplaceable four rolls of film by Capa...only to turn them over to a 15-year-old-lab assistant for developing."  To understand what actually happened requires a little bit of darkroom knowledge.

The film that Capa used that day, Super-XX, was a panchromatic film, meaning it was sensitive to all wavelengths of visible light.  Photographic paper, by contrast, is orthochromatic, meaning it is not sensitive to red light, which is why prints can be processed in a darkroom under red light.  But this would ruin a roll of panchromatic film.  The film had to be processed in complete darkness.

In a completely dark room, the technician opens the cannister of film by popping off one end, then pulls out the spool holding the film that is wound around it.  The technician then feeds the film onto another larger spool that allows for spaces between each layer of film so that it can be bathed in developing chemicals.  The film is wound onto this developing spool starting with the first frame on the roll, which means the last frames comprise the outer layer.  Capa’s surviving images, at the end of roll A, would have been present on that outer layer on the spool. 

This spool, and any others, are then placed into a light-tight developing tank, into which the developing chemicals are placed for specific times at particular temperatures to produce useable negatives. 

However, given the vicissitudes of producing photographs in combat conditions, it was not uncommon to peek at the film prior to halting development.  For example, if film had been underexposed, it might need a longer time in the developer.  W. Eugene Smith did this commonly.

Development is then stopped, often with water or even vinegar, and excess silver ions are “fixed” out of the emulsion while leaving the reduced metallic silver grains on the film with the third bath, fixer.  Finally, the film is rinsed thoroughly before hanging it to dry.

As Coleman emphatically states, it doesn’t make sense that processing the film would be left in the hands of a teenaged lad, but there is nothing in Morris’ story to indicate that it was.  I believe the development was handled by Hans Wild.  It is entirely plausible that Wild peeked at the roll from Contax A toward the end of development, saw the last images on the outer layer of the spool, finished the processing, put the film in the sink to wash, and notified the anxious Morris that the pictures were fabulous.  When it was fully rinsed, which takes about ten minutes, he probably told Banks to finish it, saying something like, “Hey, kid, stick those negs in the dryer and add some heat.  We’ve got a deadline to meet!”

Banks could have been trusted to hang the film to dry.  This is exactly the type of duty an inexperienced "darkroom lad" would be expected to do.  Wild was probably busy processing all the film that arrived by courier that night and making contact sheets for the censors, despite Coleman’s claim that they were all just sitting around with nothing to do, twiddling their thumbs.  In fact, I imagine the London Life office was very hectic during one of the greatest battles of the history of the world.  It’s ludicrous to think it was anything other than utter chaos.*

At some point, Banks would have seen that the emulsion on the roll from Contax B contained illegible images, and quite possibly assumed he did it by overheating.  After all, it went from fabulous to ruined with the hot cabinet as the only variable.  Banks probably showed the film to Wild, who realized the catastrophic magnitude of this blunder, and probably told him that he had to tell the boss.  

The Clan, who predetermined that an incompetent, cowardly, conniving Capa blew it at Omaha Beach, contend that Capa fabricated this darkroom mishap story to cover for his timid failure on D-Day.  They claim that he concocted the story to make him and Morris look heroic. 

Herrick claimed, “The last thing he [Capa] would have wanted was for the complete set of his D-Day pictures to surface… None of the many shots he claimed to have taken at the shingle would have turned up, because he never reached that point and invented that incident.” (31)  This assertion is pure speculation without foundation. 

But, it begs the question, how did roll B get ruined?



* Herrick has shown that Morris omitted a key aspect regarding the handling of film from correspondents.(29,30)   E.K. Butler explained the process in Editor and Publisher magazine, 1944, Volume 77, Issue 47, page 16. All film had to be managed by the Ministry of Information censors.  Couriers brought the film to the MOI, not directly to the magazine offices.  It was logged in before it was couriered to the appropriate outlet, such as Life magazine offices, for processing.

 After developing the film, the technicians printed contact sheets and prints, which were returned to the MOI for inspection during the day. At night, finished prints were returned to the MOI as radio prints.  Censors retained any material deemed secret, then returned the remaining film to the magazine for editing and publication.  That’s a lot oftechnical detail that would distract from the main story, which I imagine is why Morris usually omitted it.

27.    https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2015/02/12/alternate-history-robert-capa-on-d-day-21/

28.    https://tdacunha.com/robert-capa/

29.    Herrick, p. 245

30.    https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2019/06/06/guest-post-28-charles-herrick-on-capas-d-day-j/

31.    Herrick, p. 269

 

Robert Capa Focus Hocus-Pocus - Introduction

The authenticity of Robert Capa’s famous, daring photographs of the invasion of Omaha Beach on D-Day, June 6, 1944, recently has come under fire. The new story of the pictures sounds pretty convincing at first blush, however a deeper analysis of the pictures, with some new experiments, lends credence to the original story and discovers new information about the event. Although Capa is no longer here to defend himself, I interrogated his pictures, allowing him to speak to us from the grave. Curious? First, I’ll introduce the story, the criticisms, and I’ll continue on from there in subsequent posts.

Robert Capa, photographer and location unknown.

Robert Capa (10/22/1913 – 5/25/54), a Hungarian by birth, named Endre Friedmann, moved to Berlin as a young man to study political science in university, and he also learned photography. However, as a Jew, he felt uncomfortable living in Germany in the 1930’s, so he moved to Paris. There he met Gerda Taro, who became his partner and lover. Both photographers, they covered the Spanish Civil War and published their photographs together under the pseudonym, Robert Capa.

When Taro was killed in 1937 in Spain, Endre took the name, Robert Capa, and continued to work. In 1938, Picture Post declared him, “The Greatest War-Photographer in the World,” when they published 26 of his photographs from that war. He then covered the Japanese invasion of China before moving to New York. From there he covered the Africa campaign and the conquest of Sicily and Italy.

He is probably best known for his photographs of the D-Day invasion of Omaha Beach on June 6, 1944. Two of these photographs have become iconic. He continued to cover World War II until VE Day on June 8, 1945. He was killed by a landmine nine years later while covering the war in Indochina.

This series of blog posts deals with only one day of his career, a day that recently has become very controversial. Capa wrote about his experience on the Easy Red sector of Omaha Beach three years later in his memoir, Slightly Out of Focus. He chose the title for several reasons, one of which was his technique of using blurry images to impart a dynamic quality to his pictures, but it was also a metaphor. On the book jacket, he admitted that it was difficult to write the truth and that he allowed himself “to go sometimes slightly beyond and slightly this side of it. All events and persons in this book are accidental and have something to do with the truth.”

Presumably, Capa spiced up this memoir in hopes of it turning into a screenplay. That never happened, and most people who read it take his comment into account. Capa’s D-Day story goes like this: He said he was given options of which group to go in with on D-Day. He wanted to go early, so he chose Easy Company on the first wave. He said he took pictures from the landing craft of men going ashore, and then he said that was sufficient for him, implying he had what he needed. About that time the boatswain kicked him off the ramp because they wanted to get out of there.

He found himself in the water, made for an obstacle to protect him from ordinance coming his way, and started taking pictures. He then jumped to a tank located closer to the shoreline, and from there he made it to shore. Once on shore he took out his second camera and took an entire roll of pictures. When he started to change out the film from that camera he described having a panic attack. He sprang up and, with both cameras held over his head, he waded out to a ship that had just off-loaded some medics. From there, he went to his mother ship and then to Weymouth, England, where he sent his pictures by courier to the offices of Life magazine in London. He then headed back to Normandy to keep photographing.

Critics question the precise time he arrived Easy Red and with whom. They question how long he stayed there. They question exactly how many pictures he took there. They say that he went in late, after the action had died down; that he did not plan to get off his landing craft; that his pictures don’t show heroic men under fire, but rather a command unit that landed under relatively quiet conditions; that he freaked out and made for the first boat that could take him out of there.

But that’s not all to the story. Once the film finally arrived at the Life office, about 36 hours after he took the pictures, they were received by John Morris, the picture editor. Morris told the darkroom staff to develop the film and make it snappy, because they had a hard deadline looming if they wanted to make the next issue of Life magazine. The negatives needed to be developed, edited, couriered to the airport, flown to Scotland, then to Washington and New York. At first, Morris received word from the darkroom that the pictures looked “fabulous.” A short while later, a young “darkroom lad” named Dennis Banks, told the horrified Morris that the negatives were ruined. In his haste to dry them, he had put a heater in the drying cabinet and turned up the heat higher than normal. He said this melted the emulsion. All of the precious images from those two rolls of film were gone, except for the magnificent last 10 (or 11) on the first roll, the ones Capa made when he first arrived at Easy Red. Morris made the deadline, the pictures were published, and the world got a glimpse of what it looked like that morning on Omaha Beach.

The same critics who are skeptical of Capa’s activities on D-Day question this story, too. First of all, why did Morris entrust these precious negatives to an inexperienced, 15-year-old “darkroom lad?” Secondly, does heat cause emulsion to melt? They did the experiment; they processed some exposed black and white film and dried it in a very hot drying cabinet. It came out fine. No melting. Based on this, and some other nuances I will discuss in subsequent posts, these critics declared that, not only did Capa fabricate large portions of his experience on Easy Red, but he and Morris concocted this darkroom “mishap myth” to cover for Capa’s lackluster performance. Rather than a failure it made them both look heroic. Morris continued to tell this story after Capa’s death, including in a book, in various documentaries and televised interviews. It has become a legend in photojournalism.

Capa’s reputation of heroism is so enduring that the Overseas Press Club annually awards an intrepid photographer working in a conflict zone the Robert Capa Gold Medal for “exceptional courage and enterprise.” Capa’s pictures from that day have become iconic. Morris went on to have a storied career as a picture editor at many magazines and he was Executive Director for years at Magnum Photos, the renowned photo agency created by Robert Capa, Henri Cartier-Bresson, and others in 1947.

In 2014, the Pulitzer Prize recipient, J. Ross Baughmam, published an article on Allan D. Coleman’s website, Nearby Café, questioning the above narrative. This launched an investigation that continues to this day and has attracted other contributors, such as Charles Herrick, Rob McElroy, Tristan Da Cunha, and others. Herrick wrote a book covering their analysis, Back Into Focus. This group has made many fine and interesting discoveries, which I will review in this blog. But their ultimate conclusions are flawed, in my opinion, and I will show those flaws in the following blog posts.

My purpose in doing this is to provide a different interpretation of the events some 81 years ago, to counterbalance the accusations and downright sneers promulgated by Coleman and his colleagues. I have no connection to Capa, Morris or Magnum. I belong to a number of photography organizations, just to support them, including the International Center of Photography (ICP). About all I get out of it is a newsletter, so I don’t view that as a conflict of interest. The ICP is one of the organizations that Coleman and his colleagues impune as part of this vast conspiracy. He refers to the people and organizations that have supposedly promulgated these lies for decades as the “Capa Consortium.”

Since the phrase, “Coleman and his colleagues,” is somewhat unwieldy, I have taken inspiration from Coleman’s, “Capa Consortium,” to refer to this group as the Coleman Clan, or simply, the Clan. When I use these terms I may be referring to the entire group, or possibly just two or more contributors.

If you read on, you will see that the discussion can get pretty technical. It references pictures and diagrams that I will include embedded in each post. If you have an interest in Robert Capa or John Morris, photojournalism, documentary photography, World War II, D-Day, Omaha Beach, Easy Red sector, or just a general interest, I promise you will find this fascinating. Have fun and please feel free to comment. I’m happy to learn where I may be wrong and I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Below this is a list of the references that I use in the blog posts. Above photograph was obtained from the Britannica website without attribution. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-Capa

1.    https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/major-stories/major-series-2014/robert-capa-on-d-day/

2.    Herrick, S. (2024) Back in Focus: The Real Story of Robert Capa’s D-Day, Casemate Publishers.

3.    Wertenbaker, C.  (1944) Invasion!  D. Appleton-Century, Co.

4.    Capa, R. Slightly out of Focus.  New York:  The Modern Library, 2001.  All quotations from this book come from pages 140-151

5.    https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2024/07/24/alternate-history-robert-capa-on-d-day-54b/

6.    https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2016/12/07/alternate-history-robert-capa-and-john-morris-a/

7.    https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2014/06/29/alternate-history-robert-capa-on-d-day-8/

8.    https://overseaspressclubofamerica.submittable.com/submit

9.    https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2015/05/17/guest-post-16-rob-mcelroy-on-robert-capa-2-a/

10. Ambrose, S. (1995) D-Day, June 6, 1944: The Climactic Battle of WWII.  Touchstone/Simon & Schuster.

11. https://www.liquisearch.com/czech_hedgehog/technical_details

12. Herrick, pp. 168-9

13. ibid., p. 173

14. ibid., p. 174

15. Ambrose, p. 320

16. https://explore.britannica.com/study/omaha-beach-typical-cross-section-and-obstacles

17. Wertenbaker, pp. 42-3

18. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2014/06/06/guest-post-11-j-ross-baughman-on-robert-capa/

19. Ambrose, p. 307

20. ibid., p. 339

21. Herrick, p.108

22. https://warchronicle.com/16th-infantry-situation-on-d-day/

23. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/06/the-man-who-took-omaha-beach-107509/

24. https://valor.militarytimes.com/recipient/recipient-22728/recipient-22728-2dsc-1/

25. Ambrose, p. 395

26. https://marathonhandbook.com/average-human-sprint-speed/

27. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2015/02/12/alternate-history-robert-capa-on-d-day-21/

28. https://tdacunha.com/robert-capa/

29. Herrick, p. 245

30. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2019/06/06/guest-post-28-charles-herrick-on-capas-d-day-j/

31. Herrick, p. 269

32. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2014/06/08/guest-post-11-j-ross-baughman-on-robert-capa-b/

33. Herrick, p. 199

34. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2022/02/08/alternate-history-robert-capa-on-d-day-51/

35. https://warchronicle.com/16th-infantry-situation-on-d-day/

36. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2015/08/02/alternate-history-robert-capa-on-d-day-25/

37. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2015/08/02/alternate-history-robert-capa-on-d-day-25/

38. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2019/02/12/alternate-history-robert-capa-on-d-day-40a/

39. https://www.nearbycafe.com/artandphoto/photocritic/2019/05/20/guest-post-27-charles-herrick-on-capas-d-day-i/